|

director mark romanek, jay-z's '99 problems' music video
09.24.04
transposing the dynamic energy of raw urban imagery and sound against
a black and white background of inner city life, director mark romanek
juxtaposed elements of harmony and chaos to produce artist jay z’s
music video “99 problems.” utilizing broken clips of footage
captured in brooklyn’s marcy housing project, romanek in conjunction
with jay z create an effective portrait of urban life. somewhere between
the almost photographic imagery and the rapid montage of cinematic movement,
romanek manages to convey jay z’s development and monumentalize
the artist’s urban roots as well as the nature of the projects themselves.
music video wire: obviously the strongest, or at least
most immediate, visual element of “99 problems” is the use
of black and white film, did you know from the start that the video had
to be shot in black and white?
mark romanek: well, i didn’t get any sort of brief
from the label. my dealings were all with jay-z directly. we had one phone
call before the job was awarded and all he said was that he wanted to
shoot something in and around the marcy houses in bedford stuyvesant where
he grew up in brooklyn. he said, “i want you to make a pissy wall
look like art,” i immediately imagined this type of gritty, urban
imagery in black & white. so, i asked jay what he thought of this
idea and he said, “i love it. let’s do it!” that was
really the entire “pitching” process. jay sort of does what
he wants.
mvw: how did you like working with jay z on this project?
mr: i liked him a lot. jay is a gentleman -- cool, hardworking,
and really funny. this was a longer shoot than he was used to and he sometimes
complained (in a totally light-hearted way) that i was forcing him walk
all over brooklyn. but, i think he knew we were making something a little
special and that since it was his last video, he was willing to put in
the extra work. i think he has similar perfectionist tendencies so, he
understood my process and the focus i put on trying to get that extra
effort out of him and everyone on the crew. our key word was “fiddling.”
if there was a delay, he would say to everyone, “it's cool. mark’s
just fiddling some more.” i tend to do a lot of..."fiddling."
mvw: after working directly with jay z to develop the
concept of the video, what was the labels first response to the treatment?
mr: well, like i said, the label wasn’t really
that involved. the treatment was pretty general. i never really got any
sort of response to the treatment from anyone. it was more a kind of formality.
jay was hiring me based on my reel and rick rubin’s strong recommendation
that i was the guy he should hire.
mvw: what was your experience shooting in the marcy projects?
mr: great. it was freezing cold and we were shooting
during school hours, so it was pretty quiet. we were able to go in there,
shoot what we needed, and split without any big crowds or hassles. it’s
a pretty photogenic place. all the people were really cool and were happy
to see jay come back for a visit. a lot of his neighbors are still there
and they’re really proud of what he’s accomplished. it was
very moving to go back to the apartment where jay grew up. he’s
come a long way and that’s one of the main things the video wanted
to portray.
mvw: being that your subject matter was based on life
in the projects, how did you choose individual scenes to achieve the overall
concept of the video?
mr: i made a list of ideas and images that aren’t
often seen in music videos, things that seemed a bit more visceral or
transgressive, and i had several location scouts go out and look for these
types of places. i also did a lot of photographic research. i looked at
a broad range of urban photo reportage by people i really admire, like
bruce davidson, helen levitt, weegee, and some of the other “new
york school” photographers. also, i drove around brooklyn a lot
just getting a feel for the borough.
mvw: there were several shots of people in the video
that could be still portraits, powerful images, what are your thoughts
on the line between film and photography?
mr: i don’t really think about those sorts of academic
distinctions much. i sort of go by my gut as to what’s just a still
image put onto motion-picture film, and what constitutes something that
is inherently cinematic yet still having the impact of a great still photograph.
this gets to the very heart of what makes one image “cinematic”
and another image less so. and i’m not sure that can really be articulated.
some images have “teeth” and others are sort of toothless.
some images feel resonant with subtext and others seem one-dimensional
and flat. some feel like they came from some deep place and others just
sit there. i guess this is one of the mysteries of cinema.
mvw: the end of the video where jay z is gunned down
is very dramatic, had you ever directed this type of scene before?
mr: i don’t think so, no. i’m not that huge
a fan of gunplay in films. it’s not fundamentally different from
shooting any other sort of scene. it just takes a little longer to set
up. that scene was done in one take with three cameras. i was tempted
to do a second take, but i chose to move on and go to other set-ups. it
was really important to me that the video be rich with varied imagery
and never repeat itself or rehash set-ups. so, just about every scene
was a “shoot-one-take-check-the-gate-and-move-on” type of
deal. the “bullet-riddling” scene was really meant to be a
kind of abstract, violent, ballet-like moment -- a visual climax. it was
very intentionally designed to teeter on the brink of the literal but
i can see why people might take it as a literal story-point.
director of photography, joaquin baca asay’s technological retrograde
for the production of “99 problems” insured that romanek and
jay z’s vision would materialize from pre through post production.
naturalistic cinematography combined with the extensive use of filters
and minimalist lighting created a gritty texture rich with expression.
mvw: how did you work with mark on the pre-production
of the video?
joaquin baca asay: mark and i have worked together a
few times this year. we just started working together and he kept saying
that he wanted to totally freak everybody out. he wanted to shoot things
for the content of the video that you’re not supposed to shoot.
when we went into official pre-production, he showed me stacks of black
and white photographs of the black ghetto world similar to what he wanted
to do. there were six or seven books of photography and honestly i can’t
remember the names of any of them; he was interested mostly in the accidental
quality of the content and just the fact that it was real. he wanted this
thing to feel very, very real. a lot of heavy duty scouting had already
been done so he was showing me all these crazy locations.
our approach was to use as little light as possible to make it feel as
real as we could. there were some places where we did a lot, like in the
club near the end of the video where there are several shots of jay z
rapping. even then we used regular household lights to light the scene.
mvw: were there any concerns shooting the video in black
and white?
ja: i’ve shot a lot of black and white film over
the years but not that frequently and i was very concerned because mark
is so particular about the way things look. i insisted on doing a test
(ended up shooting a pretty scientific film test), which they weren’t
budgeted or scheduled for. it wasn’t a lighting test or a look test,
it was more like what does this film do and what kind of latitude does
it have in terms of exposure. i tested several filters, which in black
and white do crazy things with the sky. for example, if you use a red
filter it can make the sky look really, really vibrant and it can also
make black skin tones pop out. we ended up doing a lot of filtration tests
even though we were not expecting to use filters at all. mark knows a
lot technically and he wanted this to be as raw as possible, but when
he saw the test, he was disturbed because the lighting didn’t look
like anything he wanted. the more we started working with the film, the
more he started to figure out that it was just to learn how the film would
look and how critical to the look of the whole thing it would be. we ended
up using filtration extensively. there are certain scenes you can really
see the filter working; there’s a shot of a kid pulling a ski mask
off his face and the texture of the ski mask is so intense that if you
see it on a good monitor you feel like you can touch it.
mvw: what type of black and white film did you use?
ja: we used double x negative, it’s 200 asa film,
but it’s a faster, slightly grainier stock and we wanted some texture
in the film. we wanted it to have some grain. but it is also a very, very
sharp film, a very beautiful film and it’s different than shooting
in color. you get a much different texture from the new color films especially
and it was important to mark that it have a real texture, authenticity
of the images. we could have shot color film and transferred it to black
and white but then we would have ended up with a much cleaner, smoother
look.
mvw: what about lenses?
ja: he really wanted to use one lens to shoot the whole
thing because he wanted a constant feeling of movement. the cuts were
almost irrelevant and you were always experiencing it from the same subjective
vantage point. everything was shot with an older zeiss 18mm prime lens
because we wanted a lot of flares and for it to look dirty, not perfect
and clean. newer lenses are very beautiful and sharp and it’s very
difficult to flare them. we used an arri 435 to shoot with, a very good
slow motion, lightweight, camera because everything was hand held and
we shot a lot of slow motion.
mvw: did you use natural light for most of the scenes?
ja: we did a lot of lighting but it was usually using
realistic fixtures. in the “dog fight” scene, we hung one
fluorescent fixture over the top of the space that was created in an abandoned
warehouse on a pier in brooklyn. i had other lights hidden around so there
would be some depth but i wanted the lights to feel like they would really
exist. there’s a scene where there are prostitutes walking in the
street and i used a simple light to simulate headlights, just to give
some light on the women’s legs. again it’s from a totally
realistic motivation and i don’t even think another dp would necessarily
know that i was lighting it. in general, that’s how i like to work.
on this video it was especially important because we wanted it to feel
like we were grabbing those moments- that they were not fabricated moments,
even though obviously they were all fabricated.
naturalism to me is fundamental to cinematography. mastering naturalism
is very difficult because you want to do something that looks realistic
but also conveys emotion. but that’s only one part of cinematography,
there are many other approaches, that’s one of the fundamentals.
you’re trying to make something that to the naked eye looks natural,
but in fact is sculpted and designed to elicit emotion and feelings. a
lot of it has to do with not just the lighting but also the way you expose
things, for example when you decide to put somebody in silhouette. there’s
a shot in the video of a kid pointing a gun out of a window. it’s
a very different choice to leave him in silhouette and obviously there
can be detail outside, but it also conceals things about him and increases
the tension that the audience feels because they can’t really see
what this kid is doing or what he’s about. that’s a naturalistic
choice but it’s also an expressive choice. in real life your eye
can see the details, you’re not seeing a silhouette when you look
at that kid, you can see what he’s doing and you can see everything
outside. dp’s make those kinds of choices to conceal and reveal.
with the jay z video, i was trying the best i could to walk into a space
and not do anything to it. if i had to do something to it, i’d try
to make it as real as possible.
mvw: when shooting the scenes with mark, was he specific
in what he wanted?
ja: it depended, sometimes he was very specific about
the framing he wanted; sometimes, he was even specific about the lighting.
mark would see something he didn’t like and would want me to change
or adjust it a little bit. when it was working really well, at least for
me and i think also for him, it was just a free for all. the height of
that was during jay z’s performance in this kind of nasty club set
up and in that it was really just freestyle. mark would tell me to shoot
from a certain angle and i would just go crazy with the camera. we would
shoot until i was exhausted and then we’d do something else. mark
would definitely give me feedback, he could dp himself, and he is incredibly
capable. he would tell me things that were missing or if he wanted it
to have a different feeling or more energy. because of the nature of photography,
the camera operation was more like a performance than a normal thing where
you’d go from a to b with this shot, it was more like getting my
energy to a certain place. i really loved the fact that i was expressing
with the camera all the time; in a way, that’s an unusual kind of
opportunity.
click
here to view the article at mvwire.com
back to press
|